The most important thing we've learned,
So far as children are concerned
Is never, NEVER, NEVER let
Them near your television set-
Or better still, just don't install
The idiotic thing at all.
In almost every house we've been,
We've watched them gaping at the screen.
They loll and slop and lounge about,
And stare until their eyes pop out.
(Last week in someone's place we saw
A dozen eyeballs on the floor.)
They sit and stare and stare and sit
Until they're hypnotised by it,
Until they're absolutely drunk
With all that shocking ghastly junk.
Oh yes, we know it keeps them still,
They don't climb out the window sill,
They never fight or kick or punch,
They leave you free to cook the lunch
And wash the dishes in the sink-
But did you ever stop to think,
To wonder just exactly what
This does to your beloved tot?
IT ROTS THE SENSES IN THE HEAD!
IT KILLS IMAGINATION DEAD!
IT CLOGS AND CLUTTERS UP THE MIND!
IT MAKES A CHILD SO DULL AND BLIND!
HE CAN NO LONGER UNDERSTAND
A FANTASY, A FAIRYLAND!
HIS BRAIN BECOMES AS SOFT AS CHEESE!
HIS POWERS OF THINKING RUST AND FREEZE!
HE CANNOT THINK - HE ONLY SEES!
'All right!' you'll cry. 'All right!' you'll say,
'But if we take the set away,
What shall we do to entertain
Our darling children? Please explain!'
We'll answer this by asking you,
'What used the darling ones to do?'
'How used they keep themselves contented
Before this monster was invented?'
Have you forgotten? Don't you know?
We'll say it very loud and slow:
THEY ... USED ... TO ... READ! They'd READ and READ,
AND READ and READ, and then proceed
To READ some more. Great Scott! Gadzooks!
One half their lives was reading books!
The nursery shelves held books galore!
Books cluttered up the nursery floor!
And in the bedroom, by the bed,
More books were waiting to be read!
Such wondrous, fine, fantastic tales
Of dragons, gypsies, queens, and whales
And treasure isles, and distant shores
Where smugglers rowed with muffled oars,
And pirates wearing purple pants,
And sailing ships and elephants,
And cannibals crouching 'round the pot,
Stirring away at something hot.
(It smells so good, what can it be!
Good gracious, it's Penelope.)
The younger ones had Beatrix Potter
With Mr. Tod, the dirty rotter,
And squirrel Nutkin, Pigling Bland,
And Mrs Tiggy-Winkle and-
Just How the Camel Got His Hump,
And How the Monkey Lost His Rump,
And Mr. Toad, and bless my soul,
There's Mr. Rat and Mr. Mole-
Oh, books, what books they used to know,
Those children living long ago!
So please, oh please, we beg, we pray,
Go throw your TV set away,
And in its place you can install
A lovely bookshelf on the wall.
Then fill the shelves with lots of books,
Ignoring all the dirty looks,
The screams and yells, the bites and kicks,
And children hitting you with sticks-
Fear not, because we promise you
That, in about a week or two
Of having nothing else to do,
They'll now begin to feel the need
Of having something good to read.
And once they start-oh boy, oh boy!
You watch the slowly growing joy
That fills their hearts. They'll grow so keen
They'll wonder what they'd ever seen
In that ridiculous machine,
That nauseating, foul, unclean,
Repulsive television screen!
And later, each and every kid
Will love you more for what you did.
P.S. Regarding little Mike Teavee,
We very much regret that we
Shall simply have to wait and see,
If we can get him back his height
But if we can't it serves him right.
See?!?! Proof that reading is off-the-hook :) This makes me just drool over books, especially such classics as Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. It helps me continue to believe that being a good person will pay off.
07 November 2009
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
The most important thing we've learned,
So far as children are concerned
Is never, NEVER, NEVER let
Them near your television set-
Or better still, just don't install
The idiotic thing at all.
In almost every house we've been,
We've watched them gaping at the screen.
They loll and slop and lounge about,
And stare until their eyes pop out.
(Last week in someone's place we saw
A dozen eyeballs on the floor.)
They sit and stare and stare and sit
Until they're hypnotised by it,
Until they're absolutely drunk
With all that shocking ghastly junk.
Oh yes, we know it keeps them still,
They don't climb out the window sill,
They never fight or kick or punch,
They leave you free to cook the lunch
And wash the dishes in the sink-
But did you ever stop to think,
To wonder just exactly what
This does to your beloved tot?
IT ROTS THE SENSES IN THE HEAD!
IT KILLS IMAGINATION DEAD!
IT CLOGS AND CLUTTERS UP THE MIND!
IT MAKES A CHILD SO DULL AND BLIND!
HE CAN NO LONGER UNDERSTAND
A FANTASY, A FAIRYLAND!
HIS BRAIN BECOMES AS SOFT AS CHEESE!
HIS POWERS OF THINKING RUST AND FREEZE!
HE CANNOT THINK - HE ONLY SEES!
'All right!' you'll cry. 'All right!' you'll say,
'But if we take the set away,
What shall we do to entertain
Our darling children? Please explain!'
We'll answer this by asking you,
'What used the darling ones to do?'
'How used they keep themselves contented
Before this monster was invented?'
Have you forgotten? Don't you know?
We'll say it very loud and slow:
THEY ... USED ... TO ... READ! They'd READ and READ,
AND READ and READ, and then proceed
To READ some more. Great Scott! Gadzooks!
One half their lives was reading books!
The nursery shelves held books galore!
Books cluttered up the nursery floor!
And in the bedroom, by the bed,
More books were waiting to be read!
Such wondrous, fine, fantastic tales
Of dragons, gypsies, queens, and whales
And treasure isles, and distant shores
Where smugglers rowed with muffled oars,
And pirates wearing purple pants,
And sailing ships and elephants,
And cannibals crouching 'round the pot,
Stirring away at something hot.
(It smells so good, what can it be!
Good gracious, it's Penelope.)
The younger ones had Beatrix Potter
With Mr. Tod, the dirty rotter,
And squirrel Nutkin, Pigling Bland,
And Mrs Tiggy-Winkle and-
Just How the Camel Got His Hump,
And How the Monkey Lost His Rump,
And Mr. Toad, and bless my soul,
There's Mr. Rat and Mr. Mole-
Oh, books, what books they used to know,
Those children living long ago!
So please, oh please, we beg, we pray,
Go throw your TV set away,
And in its place you can install
A lovely bookshelf on the wall.
Then fill the shelves with lots of books,
Ignoring all the dirty looks,
The screams and yells, the bites and kicks,
And children hitting you with sticks-
Fear not, because we promise you
That, in about a week or two
Of having nothing else to do,
They'll now begin to feel the need
Of having something good to read.
And once they start-oh boy, oh boy!
You watch the slowly growing joy
That fills their hearts. They'll grow so keen
They'll wonder what they'd ever seen
In that ridiculous machine,
That nauseating, foul, unclean,
Repulsive television screen!
And later, each and every kid
Will love you more for what you did.
P.S. Regarding little Mike Teavee,
We very much regret that we
Shall simply have to wait and see,
If we can get him back his height
But if we can't it serves him right.
See?!?! Proof that reading is off-the-hook :) This makes me just drool over books, especially such classics as Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. It helps me continue to believe that being a good person will pay off.
24 October 2009
New Favorite Author: Shannon Hale
Profanity - None!
Violence - 1 (there were some short-lived action scenes)
Sexuality - 1 (for nudity)
This is the kind of book where I would be thrilled if my daughter read it during the "tween" years. You readers well remember those years I am sure where you just had no clue where to fit in or if you could, should, or would fit in. And just like the characters in the book, it is life's experiences that help you solidify you place in the world...and sometimes it really does take at least 1,000 days :)
The next book:
The Goose Girl
Profanity: None!
Violence: 1
Sexuality: 1
Also a treat to read. If I had the money, or maybe I should dream big and say when I have the money, I would love to buy books and pass them out instead of candy at Halloween. How fun would that be to go Trick-or-Treating and come back with Harry Potter, or The Goose Girl, or for you older readers - Twilight :) lol. Hale has another female character searching for her spot in the world. What woman isn't searching for something? True love, a dream job...it seems like people are looking to find that one thing in life that makes them feel at home with themselves. Where they can finally look in the mirror and like who they are without pinching at those 5 extra pounds, pushing themselves to be perfectionists, or comparing themselves to everyone else. Wouldn't it be nice to finally look at a project you made, a meal you cooked, or your children for that matter and think, "Look how nice that turned out." instead of, "Well, it's OK, but so-an-so down the street did it this and this and this way which obviously means I'm a bad mom (wife, sister, kid, whatever)."
Just finished this one:
Princess Academy
Profanity: None
Violence: 1
Sexuality: None
I have to say that, although well written and still a fun book, this one was probably the least favorite of all of them. Maybe I was just experiencing a Princess-burnout, but I didn't get into this one as much as I did Goose Girl or Book of a Thousand Days. I can't pretend not to know why. I don't feel like the romantic interest resolved itself very well. I had such high hope for my little Miri flower, but then they were dashed by a late evening walk?!?!?! Who ends a romantic interest with an evening walk?!?!? I'm still going over the options in my mind. Maybe a walk means they just stay friends, maybe a walk means they went and hiked all over the hills and mountains until they had pounded out every detail of their future lives together, or maybe the goat just needed some exercise. Who knows? AND THAT, dear readers...is what I can't stand. Unresolved threads are like hems that are unraveling. Who knows how it will get pieced back together?!?! Hmmm I am having a post-read anxiety attack. Gonna sign off now... Tschuess
24 August 2009
The Sound and the Fury

Profanity: 3
Violence: 1
Sexuality: 3
It took me a while. Every time I think back on this book all I can think of is that sentence..."It took me a while." Not just to read the book, but to figure out what was going on, and follow the plot, and figure out who was speaking. That was a hard read man. Just be aware, Faulkner writes each section of the book from each different character's point of view so that is why it seems disjointed and why it seems to re-cover the same material. There is a plot, a rather thin one, but a plot nonetheless and the first section of the book shows the plot being introduced by the handicapped brother of the other main characters. Now talk about confusing, but I was able to appreciate Faulkner's ability to try and portray how the mind of a person with disabilities would really work. So if you are able to figure out the plot within the first third of the book....congrats! I couldn't and I still feel like I am missing big pieces or have it all wrong. But, never fear. The last two-thirds of the book are told by the other siblings in the story and make a little more sense. Not much, but a little. As for me, there was way to much incest for me to really enjoy it. It was just plain weird, so even though I feel like I am missing some major points of the book, I am not going to go back a re-read it. There are no explicit scenes or anything like that, but it talked about sex and incest enough that I am done. Yucky yucky yucky...and ewww gross!
19 August 2009
Pride and Prejudice

Profanity: 1
Violence: 1
Sexuality: 1
Ahhh! What year is really complete without having read Pride and Prejudice once. I always think about the part in the movie "You've Got Mail" where Meg Ryan is e-mailing Tom Hanks about reading Pride and Prejudice every year. She just loves that Mr. Darcy and know matter how many times she has read it, she still can't wait to see if they will overcome their individual pride and prejudices and get married. Sigh of bliss! I feel the exact same way. Then, the movie flips scenes and shows Tom Hanks trying to read Pride and Prejudice. He gets bored or frustrated or whatever and slams the book shut and then re-opens it and tries reading again and rolls his eyes because he probably thinks it is the lamest thing he has ever read and that makes me think of my husband...poor guy. I think I have made him suffer through about every film version of this book that there is (but fellow readers I have stopped the chick-flick carnage at the 6-hour A&E version...I just can't do that to him :). And then after reading Pride and Prejudice with all of its witty/sarcastic dialogues, insight into the caste system, old English culture, etc. I just think to myself, "When will there ever be other classics like this written?" Seriously, what book that has been written in the last five years is going to be such a favorite for the next 200? It seems like publishers are willing to publish such junk these days and people just eat it up and call it good. It's like eating an apple when what your soul really wants is fresh-baked, homemade, piping hot apple pie with cold vanilla ice cream and a tall glass of ice cold milk. So refreshing, so delicious, and one can appreciate all the work that went into it. Sometimes I feel like the books I am reading are just the dregs of someones imagination. No talent, sweat, blood, or guts went into it and yet they still got published. And then I see people who would truly love to publish and work so hard at their writing and get edited again, and again, and again, but never see anything come from it. Sorry to rant and rave dear readers. This really has nothing to do with Pride and Prejudice, I know, but when I read such a quality book as that, it makes it hard to go back to the pathetic novels of our generation. I wish I could write....I probably shouldn't be soo critical because I have no writing talent whatsoever. I have been trying to put together a children's story for two months now. It is a story my dad made up and I have been wanting to just write it down and make it into some sort of little keepsake for him, but alas! I have no talent for it. What a shame :)
18 August 2009
Kim

Profanity: 2
Violence: 2
Sexuality: 1
Kim was definitely a harder read for me. Maybe you breezed through it, but I found myself continually putting it down, picking it back up, putting it down, even fell asleep once, etc. The sad thing is that it is not even a boring book. I must just not really have been in the mood for a book like that is all I can figure. Looking back, I really liked it, but in the moment....snooze. Kim IS an interesting book. It is all about an Irish boy who is raised in India by an opium-smoking nanny. Where can one go wrong with a plot like that. The adventure in the story grows as Kim, who possesses a knack for intrigue, disguise, and espionage; joins the "Great Game". I liked reading all about how they trained him in the arts of disguise and spying, but I actually liked the sub-plot better. Kim meets up with a Buddhist who is looking for a special river that will heal him and together, they go on a journey to find this river. Kim spends quite a bit of time with him and becomes his disciple of sorts. The old Buddhist imparts much of his knowledge, wisdom, and learning on Kim and I found that all the more fascinating than the espionage games he played. Also, Rudyard Kipling used the book as a way to explore cultures in India and compare it against western-European Anglo-Saxon cultures. I love learning about new places, people, religions, and cultures so that was more to my fancy than anything else. I was less inclined to read during the parts where Kim was learning about the "Great Game" than when Kipling was delving into the cultures of the high mountain villages...do people really live up there and if so, how in the world do they survive? But Kim himself is a feisty, rascally sort of character who has a good heart, but tricky ways. I liked him a lot.
14 August 2009
Emma

04 August 2009
The Magic Finger

Profanity: 1
Violence: 1
Sexuality: 1
Disclaimer: There was absolutely no violence, profanity, or sexuality in this book. It is a children's book for cryin' out loud, so maybe I should amend my rating system to include 0 (zero) as well, but this little gem is fabulous and short so put it together and you have fabulously short, or shortly fabulous, or fabulous shorts...either way - cute cute cute book! I read it to the little kiddies in one sitting and mine lasted all the way until the last 5 pages and that is saying something since she is still into board books and the like. I do have to wonder though, after reading such a book, if Roald Dahl was an animal rights activist. This short story is all about a family of hunters who get the wrath of a girl's magic finger turned on them. The little girl ends up turning the family into the very same type of animal they were shooting at in an attempt to teach them how the animals feel so that they will never hunt again. So, would Mr. Dahl throw paint on all of the deer mounts that the hubby has in his parents garage? My husband is an avid big game hunter, and I have done a lot of bird hunting myself. The question is whether or not what we do is ethical. It is partly out of sport. The king of the castle got his last deer at 533 yards and was very proud of himself, so there is obviously some sport to it for us, but at the same time, we don't just kill to kill. We eat the meat, and whatever we can't eat, we share with family and friends. Venison burgers, venison tacos, venison meatballs in spaghetti; we eat it all. So, what is the difference then between eating steak and eating venison? Why is hunting so wrong and eating bacon and sirloin steak so socially acceptable by most (vegetarians aside)? I agree whole-heartedly that to kill animals just for skin or sport is wrong, but if one is going to use most of the animal, especially the meat and hide, I don't see any problem with hunting in season. I can either gather my food at the super-market or in the mountains. Either way, I gotta eat :)
31 July 2009
The BBC Book List
21 July 2009
Twilight
Profanity: 1
Sexuality: 2
Violence: 2
So, I finally jumped on the Twilight band-wagon and read the series, but am only posting on the first book for now. It was...let's just say I have mixed emotions on how I feel about this series. One part of me thinks, "Well it was obviously entertaining enough to read all four books. And, when given a chance, has a pretty decent (albeit underdeveloped) plot. There is even some humor, romance, and action." But the other part of me thinks a couple of different things:
a) You could chop 200+ pages out of each book and not miss ANYTHING. How many times does a reader really need to be told that Edward's hands are cold? I got the picture the first 14 times and after that...super repetitious. Maybe that's why, for the first time in my life, I liked a movie better than its book-counterpart. The movie edited out the 200+ pages that were...unnecessary to say the least, but most importantly, not well written.
b) Whatever happened to character development being a crucial factor in writing? Especially when said characters seem to go through such life-changing experiences. Shouldn't it do something or take the story somewhere? Shouldn't the personality improve or change in some way or maybe learn from their stupid mistakes? I guess I should be a little more specific. Bella, as we all see, is the little martyr of the story. Bad things happen to her, but she is stoic, impassive, and unimpressed. And so she remains through all four books. In the words of Kronk from 'Emperor's New Groove', "There's a wall there."
c) The writing itself is immature. Enough said. I'm not quite sure why every stay-at-home mom I know thinks this is the best thing they have read since 'Pride and Prejudice'. Jane Austen's dialogues are sooo much better. But, I can understand why each and every thirteen year old wishes Edward Cullen were real. 'Nuff said.
Other than that, I found it entertaining simply because I haven't really read a story like that before. I am impressed with what seems like an original plot - Readers correct me if I am wrong cause I know I haven't read every book in the world...yet, but is there another teenage vampire love story out there? Not too shabby. Plus, the writing in the book that is done really well are the awkward, tense conversations between Bella and Edward when they first meet. It shows how uncomfortable first aquaintances can be, but especially if the person you meet wants to kill you. I hate it when that happens :) But Meyer does a particularly good job helping the reader to feel this tension. I was feeling awkward and uncomfortable reading it and I like books that allow the reader to feel and/or imagine some of the same emotions a character is going through. I think it helps with the imagining part.
So fellow book-worms, Twilight is an ok read. On a scale of 1-5 I'd give it a 2 1/2 for being partially enjoyable, partially well-written, partially cool; but also partially annoying, partially lame, and partially immature. Keep Reading!
14 July 2009
The True Story of Hansel and Gretel

Profanity: 5
Violence: 4
Sexuality: 5
Wow Wow Wow...that's all i can say...and not in a good way either. There is no way in #$^@ that this book should have ever been on The New York Times Bestseller List. Absolutely pathetic. This was the other book I splurged on for my trip to Brazil, and I have never been more disappointed. I didn't even finish reading it, for there is no need to fill my mind with trash, profanity, and garbage and pretend that it is wholesome, intelligent, and inspires me to improve my life in some way. I bought the book because I love history (especially any history related to WWII) and I lived in Germany for almost two years. I was excited and thought that the book would provide an interesting historical-fictional twist to the whole subject of the rise and fall of the Third Reich, the Russian front, the Holocaust, and WWII in general. Needless to say, this book was anything but that. All it did was F-You it's way through a lame story line that had no depth, acurateness, or character developement. If all I have to do to get published and even on The New York Times Bestseller list is to string together a long litany of profanities that end in rape then sign me up...except for the fact that I won't sell my soul to indescretion in order to be in a newspaper for a week, only to be replaced by next week's bestseller. What happened to needing talent in order to get published?
Ok so I have heard the other side of the argument that so and so presented such a thought-provoking, insightful image into the atrocities of war. I'm not trying to say that a book based on such subjects as WWII or the Holocaust is going to be all walks in the park with butterflies and the girl off of 'Enchanted' but I do say that such subjects as war, rape, murder, etc. can be talked about in an appropriate and dare I say - mature - way. Bad things, even atrocious things, happen. But do we really want to degrade it even farther by talking about it in a slimy, pathetic way...all in an attempt to sell a book? I don't think so. I won't waste any more brain cells on this, and I wouldn't recommend you waste any either.
